On Dec 11, 2007 1:53 AM, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 10:15 PM, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
That works only for !!, not for future recurrences of the same situation involving other users. !!'s innocence was conclusively demonstrated through the posting of an email that embarassed Durova, and which Durova did her best to keep third parties from seeing.
I recall !! was unblocked significantly before that email was posted - because some users knew that user's previous identity and because people examined !!'s contribution history and found nothing problematic.
Exactly. !! was exonerated 75 minutes after the blocking. The publication of Durova's e-mail, many days later, was political drama and ritual humiliation.