On 4/26/06, Timwi <timwi(a)gmx.net> wrote:
I don't see how that difference is in any way
relevant to this thread. A
crappy native speaker is no more useful to Wikipedia than a crappy
non-native speaker.
Timwi
You've completely missed my point. My point was that the distinction
was valid because on average native speakers are better than
non-native speakers for whatever language we are talking about, an
observation that meshes with common sense and my personal
observations.
~maru