On 5/18/07, sean(a)epoptic.com <sean(a)epoptic.com> wrote:
I hope this reply doesn't violate the terms of my
surrender, but I have
to point out one small irony -- a fair use claim to that unique cover is
extremely weak. That particular cover is Dr. Barrett's signed personal
creation, and Wikipedia has no need to use it when there are more generic
images available.
Now I'm very confused. How does this version of the cover differ from
the generally released cover - simply Dr. Barrett's signature?
I don't think that part of our fair use requirements, or the law's for
that matter, require the most generic image available.
-Matt