On 5/18/07, sean@epoptic.com sean@epoptic.com wrote:
I hope this reply doesn't violate the terms of my surrender, but I have to point out one small irony -- a fair use claim to that unique cover is extremely weak. That particular cover is Dr. Barrett's signed personal creation, and Wikipedia has no need to use it when there are more generic images available.
Now I'm very confused. How does this version of the cover differ from the generally released cover - simply Dr. Barrett's signature?
I don't think that part of our fair use requirements, or the law's for that matter, require the most generic image available.
-Matt