On 6/3/07, James Farrar <james.farrar(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hey, it's besides the point anyway.
You've advocated a single person's
opinion (without that person neading any reason more than IDONTLIKEIT)
being sufficient to change the requirement for inclusion from
"consensus to delete" to "overwhelming consensus to keep, and even
that might not be enough".
I describe the situation as is. If you have a problem with it I
suggest you find a way to change it.
That would require not having any power-tripped admins. I'll settle
for reducing the number.