On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:23:55 -0800, "George Herbert"
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What's ended up happening is, perhaps both
typically and tragically,
Wikipedia standard controversy reaction - it's up, it's down, it's
back up, it's moved, it's moved again, it's speedy deleted then
restored then deleted and up for DR and sideways with sugar on top and
can I please have a little more, sir?
All the more reason to go back to my proposal of many reiterations: no
article on any event until at least a year after it has happened, to
allow time to form a proper historical perspective.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG