On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:23:55 -0800, "George Herbert" george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
What's ended up happening is, perhaps both typically and tragically, Wikipedia standard controversy reaction - it's up, it's down, it's back up, it's moved, it's moved again, it's speedy deleted then restored then deleted and up for DR and sideways with sugar on top and can I please have a little more, sir?
All the more reason to go back to my proposal of many reiterations: no article on any event until at least a year after it has happened, to allow time to form a proper historical perspective.
Guy (JzG)