Faraaz Damji wrote:
The old argument is true: if you don't want to see
a clitoris, then
don't go to [[clitoris]].
<snip>
Also, if I want to learn more about what something
like
[[autofellatio]] is, I should be able to choose to display images as a
link if I want. Even if I want to learn about [[autofellatio]], I might
not want to have a picture of a guy masturbating appear right next to
the information
Suppose I want to learn about something. I look it up in an
encyclopedia. The paper kind. I might happen to see something offensive.
But how do I know I could see something offensive unless I know what it is?
Your argument "if you don't want to see a clitoris, don't go to
clitoris" doesn't help people who don't know what a clitoris is.
Therefore, saying "I might
not want to have a picture of a guy masturbating appear right next to
the information" falls into the same category - you can't object to
something if you don't know what it is. It's like goatse - highly
offensive, but unless you know what it is, you can't avoid it.
--
Alphax
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those
to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.' - C. S. Lewis