John Bradley wrote:
What personal attacks have I made because I have been repremanded? My disgust strtches far further back than that.
When did it start and why?
It also yet again seems that I what I have done is a personall attack then so is everyones critisms of me. another example of 1 rule for the arbcommas.
I'm not on the Arbcom, but calling people "stupid immature idiots" won't help your case. Talking about "invalid, illogical, unreferenced, biased claims" in articles might - attack the idea, never the person.
My request for a page to be deleted was not spam, that several people have decided to use it as an opportunity to rake over the coals is not my problem.
What a person has in their user space is their concern unless it breaks policy (eg. is defamatory, illegal). Many people have pages like this as watchlists.
Don't forget the disclaimer that you submitted all entries to Wikipedia under - All contributions to Wikipedia are released under the GNU Free Documentation License. The history of the mistakes you have made in the past cannot be erased, but that doesn't mean you have to make them in the future. Be polite, discuss things, never revert without talking about what you are doing and why.