On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:46:03 -0800, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
To use NOR as a bare tool to
excuse the omission of information is a perversion of the basis for
having that guideline in the first place.
Depends on context. If the people pushing a very minor fringe theory
don't include sources, there really is no problem with removing it.
Exactly. It was for this kind of situation that the rule was
formulated. Actual application hasd sometimes gone to extremes.
Ec