Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:46:03 -0800, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
To use NOR as a bare tool to excuse the omission of information is a perversion of the basis for having that guideline in the first place.
Depends on context. If the people pushing a very minor fringe theory don't include sources, there really is no problem with removing it.
Exactly. It was for this kind of situation that the rule was formulated. Actual application hasd sometimes gone to extremes.
Ec