On 5/3/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/3/06, Kirill Lokshin kirill.lokshin@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/3/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
You make some excellent points. A way of easily migrating free images once checked by confirmed users would solve my original problem. Can you elaborate on these increasingly stringent demands?
Aside from the propensity of random people to tag 15th-century paintings with {{nsd}}? ;-)
If the copy of the painting was made within the uk it is quite posible it is under copyright. Or at least the copyright status would be rather complex.
Curious. I was under the impression that Bridgeman v Corel drew no distinction based on where the copy was made (if the copy is accurate, how could you tell?), and that _any_ (two-dimensional, slavish, etc.) reproduction of a PD artwork was considered PD under US law.
Kirill