On 5/3/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/3/06, Kirill Lokshin
<kirill.lokshin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/3/06, Steve Bennett
<stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You make some excellent points. A way of easily
migrating free images
once checked by confirmed users would solve my original problem. Can
you elaborate on these increasingly stringent demands?
Aside from the propensity of random people to tag 15th-century
paintings with {{nsd}}? ;-)
If the copy of the painting was made within the uk it is quite posible
it is under copyright. Or at least the copyright status would be
rather complex.
Curious. I was under the impression that Bridgeman v Corel drew no
distinction based on where the copy was made (if the copy is accurate,
how could you tell?), and that _any_ (two-dimensional, slavish, etc.)
reproduction of a PD artwork was considered PD under US law.
Kirill