Geoff Burling wrote:
Am I the only one who envisions the possibility that
most of the people
who voted for this rule could be banned for various lengths of time for
sarcasm? And what would then prevent all of the people who voted no -- &
who were, um, careful not to be sarcastic during this period -- from
holding another vote & repealing this rule?
I guess no one wants to raise this question because it might appear to be
trolling. I hope not, because it raises some issues that I feel are just
as important as many of the arguments in favor of this prohibition.
By having Wikipedia's own 18th Amendment we could protect people from
becoming drunk with power.
Ec