doc wrote:
Well, it looks like a coup.
The poll was closed by its supporters a few days ago, having run for
barely a week. Fairly outrageous, considering most things are allowed to
run for a few weeks minimum, but I assumed it had been closed because
with less that 65% support there was an evident lack of consensus.
However, some dev felt differently, judged there to be a consensus, and
we now have rollback enabled - without any waring whatsoever.
Admins can switch it off or on, but there's absolutely no agreed policy
for when, how, and how disputes are resolved. The inevitable bureaucracy
will follow.
This to me is the definition of disruption and the antithesis of consensus.
sigh
Who was the developer? Where is his decision explained? What were his
criteria? Where did he announce it? To whom is he accountable? Where do
I ask for a reconsideration?
This was bulldozed by some very determined people who were determined to
get their way come what may.