On 01/04/2008, Ian Woollard
<ian.woollard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 01/04/2008, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The logo is in effect under an ND license and by
leavening it in the
image we get a ah limited derivatives image.
No, not in any significant way.
Please present your arguments for this claim.
As a
result the NASA logo is not compatible with free content.
The logo *itself* in isolation might be, but the images with it
aren't; they're public domain you can modify them as much as you want.
False there are many modifications you cannot make to those images.
Editing in some images of the KKK for example would cause problems.
Editing in changes like that would get libel suits from most
organisations, even under so called "free/derivatives allowed"
licenses. That is a red-herring against the entire idea of open data.
There's
*nothing* stopping you changing the image in any sensible way
including removing the tags if you wish.
You are claiming that creating Old Negro Space Program fan art is not
a sensible use?
The images with the tags removed are free. With then not removed they are not.
--
geni