On 3/26/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
I await with interest the court's interpretation of the merits of the
case.
Guy (JzG)
Is this the first case specifically targeting WP/WMF along these lines?
Trying to hold us liable for reporting what OTHERS said? It could be a slam
dunk precendent for us in a good way if the Judge dismisses, right? As in,
we aren't responsible for reporting what others said?
--
- Denny