On 3/26/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
I await with interest the court's interpretation of the merits of the case.
Guy (JzG)
Is this the first case specifically targeting WP/WMF along these lines? Trying to hold us liable for reporting what OTHERS said? It could be a slam dunk precendent for us in a good way if the Judge dismisses, right? As in, we aren't responsible for reporting what others said?