Jimbo's word on the matter:
The point is, we don't act *in Wikipedia* as a Democrat, a
Republican, a pro-Lifer, a pro-Choicer, or whatever. Here we are
Wikipedians, which means: thoughtful, loving, neutral.
With all due respect to you and Jimbo, that's not the way it happens.
Thoughtful, loving, neutral, touchy-feely gets good marks, but editors don't
suddenly turn into opinionless automatons. Nor do we want them to. We want
Republicans to have input into articles on the Republican Party. We just
don't want it to be Republican propaganda.
With all due respect to you, I think you're slightly misinterpreting
what Jimbo (and I) actually mean. I don't think either of us are
suggesting that editors should be 'opinionless automatons', just that
they shouldn't let their opinions influence the way they write articles.