Katefan0 wrote:
Personally, I think it's just about right that the
policy state that
information without a source may be removed. (Perhaps it should be more
pointed -- disputed information without a source). Didn't Jimbo say as much
in one of his responses to Seigenthaler?
Part of the problem is with the permissive word "may", which is too
often read as though it were "shall".
Ec