Charles Matthews (charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com) [041206 06:48]:
Stan Shebs wrote
> [...] but I
> can see WP *creating* a demand for new original research, to
> answer questions that have come up.
I don't think 'original research' should
cover original scholarship. That's
a stretch.
I don't think it is. Wikipedia is not somewhere people writing on a subject
should be coming to new conclusions.
- d.