Charles Matthews (charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com) [041206 06:48]:
Stan Shebs wrote
[...] but I can see WP *creating* a demand for new original research, to answer questions that have come up.
I don't think 'original research' should cover original scholarship. That's a stretch.
I don't think it is. Wikipedia is not somewhere people writing on a subject should be coming to new conclusions.
- d.