On Sep 14, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Phroziac wrote:
On 9/14/05, Snowspinner <Snowspinner(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I would rather have an encyclopedia that has a
truly staggering
amount of information but that some people dismiss because it has
some silly articles than a well-respected but heavily incomplete
encyclopedia. If I wanted that, I'd just go to Britannica.
Isn't that exactly why we exist?
I always thought so.
-Snowspinner