On Jan 10, 2009, at 2:47 PM, WJhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
When challenged, a contributor, must not only *state*
that person A
is a
previously published expert in this area, but *show* that that is
the case.
The burden of proof that someone is a previously published (by a third
party) author/expert is on the contributor, not the deleter.
So. Is there evidence on the table here?
For the expertise of Richard Bartle?
I'm sorry. Let me try again.
For the expertise of [[Richard Bartle]]?
-Phil