If readers
continue to want to read about it, then it continues to be
notable, no?
No, notablity was established by the amount of information published in
significant reliable sources. Reader, and editor, interest is irrelevant.
My bad. My comment was based on the apparently mistaken premise that
we were speaking English when using words such as "notable".
However, we do need a mechanism for weeding out
information which is no
longer of interest to readers or editors.
Why? Is it irrelevant, or is it relevant?