This is the entire passage under the heading "Israel" in the article "Allegations of apartheid"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid
Does any objective person consider it to be NPOV?
*Israel* *Main article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheidAllegations of Israeli apartheidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid *
The phrase "Israeli apartheid" (or the terming of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheidIsraelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israelan "apartheid state") is a controversial phrase used by some critics of Israel, who compare Israel's treatment of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheidPalestinianshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinianswith the treatment of blacks in apartheid-era South Africa. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid[82]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-PilgerThe majority of academics and journalists who have commented on the term are reported to deplore its use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid[83]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-Adamon the grounds that it is historically inaccurate, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheidantisemitichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid[84]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-Pulzerpropaganda, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid[83]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-Adamand a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheidpolitical epithethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_epithetused to justify http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheidterrorist attacks against Israel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid[85]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-Phillips http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid ------- For one thing the sentence states as fact that the term "Israeli apartheid" is "*historically inaccurate, *antisemitichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid, propaganda, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheidand a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheidpolitical epithethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_epithetused to justify http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheidterrorist attacks against Israel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid" something a wikipedia article should not be asserting. Secondly the paragaraph is not neutral and strongly weighted with the view that Israeli apartheid is not an acceptable term.
Several editors have attempted to correct this paragraph's bias but they have been blocked by a larger number of determined editors pushing a POV against the term.