This is the entire passage under the heading "Israel" in the article "Allegations of apartheid" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid Does any objective person consider it to be NPOV? *Israel* *Main article: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>Allegations of Israeli apartheid<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid&… * The phrase "Israeli apartheid" (or the terming of <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>Israel<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel>an "apartheid state") is a controversial phrase used by some critics of Israel, who compare Israel's treatment of <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>Palestinians<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinians>with the treatment of blacks in apartheid-era South Africa. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>[82]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-Pilger>The majority of academics and journalists who have commented on the term are reported to deplore its use <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>[83]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-Adam>on the grounds that it is historically inaccurate, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>antisemitic<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>[84]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-Pulzer>propaganda, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>[83]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-Adam>and a <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>political epithet<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_epithet>used to justify <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>terrorist attacks against Israel <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism>. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>[85]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid#_note-Phillips> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid> ------- For one thing the sentence states as fact that the term "Israeli apartheid" is "*historically inaccurate, *antisemitic<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>, propaganda, <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>and a <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>political epithet<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_epithet>used to justify <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>terrorist attacks against Israel <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism>. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_apartheid>" something a wikipedia article should not be asserting. Secondly the paragaraph is not neutral and strongly weighted with the view that Israeli apartheid is not an acceptable term. Several editors have attempted to correct this paragraph's bias but they have been blocked by a larger number of determined editors pushing a POV against the term.