On 11/22/05, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Why not? If it can't, either feed them in more
slowly in the first place
or extend the IfD deadline to allow the backlog to build up without
overwhelming processing.
5000 links causes issues with page load time. The page would probably
be inacesserble on dialup and frankly and meaningful review of that
number of images would be imposible.
If we're having to delete articles without taking
adequate care because
our current mechanisms aren't capable of providing adequate care, that's
an argument for changing our current mechanisms rather than an argument
that we _should_ be deleting articles that way.
We did change stuff after that. We redid all our fair use templates.
Now we just need to get people to read them.
--
geni