On 11/22/05, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Why not? If it can't, either feed them in more slowly in the first place or extend the IfD deadline to allow the backlog to build up without overwhelming processing.
5000 links causes issues with page load time. The page would probably be inacesserble on dialup and frankly and meaningful review of that number of images would be imposible.
If we're having to delete articles without taking adequate care because our current mechanisms aren't capable of providing adequate care, that's an argument for changing our current mechanisms rather than an argument that we _should_ be deleting articles that way.
We did change stuff after that. We redid all our fair use templates. Now we just need to get people to read them.
-- geni