Wednesday, January 3, 2007, 8:56:12 PM, Ray wrote:
Too many on these subjects, or too few on
"good" subjects?
Too few on "good" subjects. And those that are on good subjects, are
not properly written. Also, probably up to a quarter are created by
their owners.
If the subject is of trivial importance the sources
should matter less.
Since when did the mainstream press become obligatory?
Wikipedia still requires verifiability and reliable sources, right?