Wednesday, January 3, 2007, 8:56:12 PM, Ray wrote:
Too many on these subjects, or too few on "good" subjects?
Too few on "good" subjects. And those that are on good subjects, are not properly written. Also, probably up to a quarter are created by their owners.
If the subject is of trivial importance the sources should matter less. Since when did the mainstream press become obligatory?
Wikipedia still requires verifiability and reliable sources, right?