The India related pages are typically being deleted because of the lack of references in the submitted article, and the almost total inability of editors elsewhere to find sources for this area except of a few major newspapers. It is extremely frustrating to find such an article on Proposed Deletion, about someone I can guess is likely to be notable, but where I can find no references to indicate this--if there is no response from the editor who added it, what alternative is there for me to do but delete it? We can potentially vary our notability standards to account for WP:Cultural bias, but I cannot see us abandoning the principle of WP:Verifiability and remaining an encyclopedia.
, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Mike Dupont jamesmikedupont@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks Martjn, yes, that is what I am saying, people are willing to submit trivial data for the hope of becoming famous, because WP is now the number one web page, instead of deleting it, I say, lets process it.
I have been studying the speedy deletion data for the past days, tuning my program, of course there is a lot of junk in there, but it seem that something similar is happening with the indian subcontinent, many pages are just being deleted because why would some actor or doctor in india or pakistan ever be notable for the western world. But if you ever wanted to study the culture of that area, such articles would be useful. If you wanted to encourage editors from that area, then it is better to thank people for the data instead of deleting it.
For my work in kosovo, trying to find contributors is very hard and having a way to collect data for free is great.
Also I am interested in free software and it seems that many free software program articles are also being deleted, I am happy to have copies of them.
thanks,
mike
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoekstra@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Carcharoth carcharothwp@googlemail.com wrote:
On 6/25/12, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoekstra@gmail.com wrote:
What's wrong with "Hi, thanks for your stuff. It didn't belong here, so we put it there for you" rather than "Hi, you put stuff here that didn't belong here. Bad user. Find an admin that will email your stuff for you through a murky procedure, so you can put it there yourself"?
I should have been clearer that if people want to spend their time doing that, fine. But there are other things on Wikipedia that need doing more urgently. Trans-wikiiing or moving stuff around is laudable, but is a sideshow to the core aim of producing and improving the quality of the online encyclopedia (as opposed to the online travel guide or hotel guide or whatever). The problem is that this sort of exhortation tends to fail when a volunteer workforce is involved. And I am aware that it is possible for different online freely licensed sites to work together in synergy, exchanging material as needed, but it still feels like a distraction from the core activities.
Carcharoth
Maybe I'm misreading the thread, but I think that Mike was proposing to use the wiki for deleted articles he set up to use this information to move it over to OSM. I was slightly amazed that this seemed to be received as a bad idea in Carcharoths post. I am not suggesting that any administrator or editor *should* do this, but it should be applauded, ot at least shouldn't be discouraged if an editor does do that.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l