On 28/09/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/28/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> You haven't experienced the amazing feats of
Jimbomancy some
> wikilawyers and obsessives will stretch to. "This edit is ABSOLUTELY
> IMPERATIVE because Jimbo suggested on a mailing list in 1989 that
> something like it would be a good idea."
That would be the anti process lot (yes I can provide
examples).
That would be both and I can too. Both sides make the error of
assuming precedent is binding rather than just a very good idea.
- d.