On 4/9/07, Jeff Raymond <jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
Seraphim Blade wrote:
Ah, there's the rub, as Shakespeare would
say. Perhaps B-class would
work as a compromise, but there's got to be some kind of uniform
standard. Otherwise, it's pretty much "Whatever anyone wants to write
about gets written about," and then we're introducing editorial bias.
We should handle inclusion/exclusion the same way as we handle
anything else-look at what the sources say (or don't say, for that
matter).
Please do - this is an inclusionist dream.
-Jeff
--
Name: Jeff Raymond
E-mail: jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com
WWW:
http://www.internationalhouseofbacon.com
IM: badlydrawnjeff
Quote: "I was always a fan of Lisa Loeb, particularly
because you kind of get the impression she
sang every song either about or to her cats.
They seem to be the driving force in most of
her creative process." - Chuck Klosterman
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I'm not sure you'd necessarily find it so. B class isn't -too- far
from GA, and requires a pretty decent article. Really, if we can write
a B article on something sourced mainly from independent sources, I
don't see much of a problem having the article. (Most of the time, all
a B needs to get to GA is some copyediting and flow, and maybe a
picture or two, there's not a significant difference in amount of
content, just in presentation.)
Seraphimblade