On 4/9/07, Jeff Raymond jeff.raymond@internationalhouseofbacon.com wrote:
Seraphim Blade wrote:
Ah, there's the rub, as Shakespeare would say. Perhaps B-class would work as a compromise, but there's got to be some kind of uniform standard. Otherwise, it's pretty much "Whatever anyone wants to write about gets written about," and then we're introducing editorial bias. We should handle inclusion/exclusion the same way as we handle anything else-look at what the sources say (or don't say, for that matter).
Please do - this is an inclusionist dream.
-Jeff
-- Name: Jeff Raymond E-mail: jeff.raymond@internationalhouseofbacon.com WWW: http://www.internationalhouseofbacon.com IM: badlydrawnjeff Quote: "I was always a fan of Lisa Loeb, particularly because you kind of get the impression she sang every song either about or to her cats. They seem to be the driving force in most of her creative process." - Chuck Klosterman
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I'm not sure you'd necessarily find it so. B class isn't -too- far from GA, and requires a pretty decent article. Really, if we can write a B article on something sourced mainly from independent sources, I don't see much of a problem having the article. (Most of the time, all a B needs to get to GA is some copyediting and flow, and maybe a picture or two, there's not a significant difference in amount of content, just in presentation.)
Seraphimblade