Christiaan Briggs said:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
However it's incorrect to say that disabling
images is
indiscriminate.
It's indiscriminate in that it stops all images from loading. There
is no discrimination involved. All images are initially blocked. A
site-based system would allow us to discriminate.
Not really. It would place the discrimination in the hands of someone
else, whereas if we disable image downloads *we* make the decision
which images we want to see. It only takes a click.
A user is not always going to know what is going to offend them until
they have looked at the content. By then it's too late. Yes the idea
relies on Wikipedia editors to decide what is going to be potentially
offensive. I don't think this would be half as difficult as some have
implied and I would find it far more acceptable than asking users to
disable images completely. Getting users to disable images in their web
browser is like using a sledge hammer to do the job of a spanner.
Christiaan