On 26/03/07, Denny Colt <wikidenny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
About the current DRV... is there a reason why
the article's history is
still obfuscated? Makes it hard for non-admins to judge/evaluate fairly.
I
see people saying "RS were there" and
others saying "No RS was there",
but I
recall seeing some. However, it's currently
just the word of people who
can
see it against all else...
Shouldn't it be restored?
Well, the point of a deletion review is to decide whether or not the
article should be undeleted. Surely undeleting it in order to decide
to undelete it seems a bit odd...
--
- Andrew Gray
I'd seen some DRVs where the article history (but not the article, which
stayed locked as that protected stub page) was restored for the duration of
the DRV so people could judge. is that an exception then? what makes
something qualify for that?
--
- Denny