On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:44:10 +0200, "Steve Bennett"
<stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That'd be cool. Let's think - what *is* the
harm in boundless
fancruft? There must be harm, or we would allow it. Perhaps it is
simply that boundless fancruft strays too far from our mission, which
is to produce an encyclopaedia that is not just a random collection of
information.
The major problem is that most of it is OR, or at least terribly
self-referential.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG