On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:44:10 +0200, "Steve Bennett" stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
That'd be cool. Let's think - what *is* the harm in boundless fancruft? There must be harm, or we would allow it. Perhaps it is simply that boundless fancruft strays too far from our mission, which is to produce an encyclopaedia that is not just a random collection of information.
The major problem is that most of it is OR, or at least terribly self-referential.
Guy (JzG)