Ray Saintonge wrote:
geni wrote:
Journals appear to be doing ok.
Mostly because they deal in specialized niches.
This is unrelated to the current thread, but I was at a meeting at the
Public Library of Science the other day and promised them that I would
make an effort to bring their work to the attention of the wider
Wikipedia community.
http://www.plos.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Library_of_Science
All content of the peer-reviewed Plos journals (including PLoS Biology,
PLoS Medicine, PLoS Genetics, etc.) is released under "by-attribution"
(Creative Commons).
Great! Has anyone created templates saying "This article incorporates
material from PLoS article XYZ (link)"?
--
Alphax -
Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
"We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales
Public key: