Jimmy Wales wrote:
Ray Saintonge wrote:
geni wrote:
Journals appear to be doing ok.
Mostly because they deal in specialized niches.
This is unrelated to the current thread, but I was at a meeting at the Public Library of Science the other day and promised them that I would make an effort to bring their work to the attention of the wider Wikipedia community.
http://www.plos.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Library_of_Science
All content of the peer-reviewed Plos journals (including PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine, PLoS Genetics, etc.) is released under "by-attribution" (Creative Commons).
Great! Has anyone created templates saying "This article incorporates material from PLoS article XYZ (link)"?