On Apr 11, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Oleg Alexandrov wrote:
The thing is that the vast majority of people do have good opinions
and
write them in good faith with the best of the project in mind. You may
not always agree with them, and surely not all opinions are equally
insightful, but that's a different matter.
There are large aspects of Wikipedia ttat are dominated by people's
whose opinions should be discounted completely as the destructive
idiocy that they are. RFA and AFD are chief among them. These
opinions are generally offered in good faith, but they are not good
opinions. They are bad opinions. They should be extirpated from
Wikipedia's infrastructure.
I have no use whatsoever for the opinions on adminship of someone who
believes Danny should not be an admin based on their disagreement
with WP:OFFICE as a policy. The project has no use for those
opinions. They are even more useless than a substub Pokemon article.
-Phil