Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 10/9/06, Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
In light of this, I am going to undelete and list the article for a fourth AfD.
Phil, it already went up on deletion review and last I looked it was majority keep deleted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Fleshlight
A large number of the "keep deleted" votes are using "it was an OFFICE action by Danny" as a basis, which as it turns out is simply not true. A lot of the other "keep deleted" votes are using various arguments that are more appropriate to an AfD instead, and I was under the impression that DRV is not supposed to be just a re-run of AfD.
A prime example of why this sort of thing should not actually be a _vote_, IMO. Trying to figure out this DRV's result simply by counting bold-faced words left standing at the end of an arbitrary deadline makes no sense here.