On 2/4/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/4/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, do explain, please, or point me to a reference.
Some things are better left alone.
If you're not going to explain, please don't mention it obliquely.
Why is that strange?
Well it isn't consistent with your claims is it.
Ack, you've stripped the context here. Other people have posted in this thread complaining that every so often people complain about the CVU. I'm evidently not the first.
I have, often.
As far as I can tell none of your edits this year are consistent with RC patrol or simular.
Nope! Try 2001-2002. There's a reason I was put on the arbcom. Actually, there are a bunch, mainly because I'm a pain in the ass about trying to figure out a better way to do things than the status quo.