On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:34 AM, stevertigo <stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sounds like just more strategic deletionist excusism.
There is no
excuse for anyone giving to destruction a higher value than they do to
creation.
So now that things are wrapping up, don't forget to hand out some
merit badges to the 'winners.' Ostensibly, there is a deletionist who
stands out from the pack, for whom a specially branded Trout Award
will do just fine.
WereSpielChequers could have expressed his concerns a bit better here.
It seems that, under the guise of this project, some people are
intentionally writing very low quality articles and then rules-lawyering
over the specific speedy deletion category names:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASeb_az86556&actio…
There can be a fine line between probing the boundary of new user treatment
and a breaching experiment.