Slim Virgin wrote:
On 6/18/07, John Lee <johnleemk(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Nevertheless, the pertinent issue
is whether it is against policy to edit through open proxies.
I think the most pressing issue is not the policy thing, but that
someone who wanted adminship was very keen to ensure that no one, not
even the Foundation, could find out anything about them. Not even the
location s/he edits from, or the ISP.
Now you're imputing motives.
Perhaps we should focus on that question: do we want
any kind of
minimum accountability from admins, or do we not care who they are, or
that one person might easily be controlling multiple admin accounts?
If we do want minimum accountability, how do we get it? If we don't
want minimum accountability, are we willing to accept the consequences
e.g. that it's currently easy for a banned or malicious user to get
adminship, not just once, but multiple times?
Perhaps it would be better to develop a consensus about what
accountability is instead of having individuals enforce their own
idiosyncratic interpretations.
Ec