Yes. Just to state : RK wanted to unite all articles
at first. Now, he is putting them into pieces.
Forget about what RK says. Since neither of you can
deal in reason alone.
I think that Julie's suggestion is the best one.
it's not really important to the community that these
few articles are dealt with in any immediate
timeframe, nor do these issues merit a rift between
two people, who are both practically alone in viewing
the subjects with too much unwarranted passion. While
interest may make for strong feelings, such strong
feelings do not necessarily make for good articles.
Julie suggested that both parties take a break, and do
other things -- I would tend to agree, though two
weeks perhaps would suffice.
I disagree with letting RK definition at the top of
his version Gaia article. This is not a proper
definition. It is a scientific definition,...
(yadda)
I hope I am not supposed to agree with everything
just
because you said it was reasonable.
You don't have to agree with everything,but you do
have to realize, that he doesn't really matter whether
you agree or not with consensus. The general
consensus, being a bell curve, is bound to have people
on either end of that curve, neither of which
represents the consensus.
I would appreciate it very much, as would everyone
else on the list if both of you took a breather -- it
would allow other more ignorant, unqualified, and
incapable people than yourselves. Despite their
incapacity, these successors will no doubt be able to
get the job done better than the experts.
Respectfoolly,
Stevertigo
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com