--- Shane King <wikipedia(a)dontletsstart.com> wrote:
I feel the risk of the review board is mostly
dependent on how much
faith people put in them. If people put too much faith in the abilities
of the review board compared to the normal process, we can get the
situation where people assume the reviewed version must be better than
the non-reviewed version. I was just pointing out that this will not
always be the case. So long as people maintain a healthy scepticism in
the review process, I think there's a lot of potential in the idea.
Yes - any such system will have to make it clear that the reviewed versions are
*not* perfect and that the current version may be more up to date and better in
other ways as well.
-- mav
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com