The system I have in mind would involve an expanded
list of questions
to ask the candidate in more detail about their contributions and how
they see themselves fitting in. Then, instead of asking editors to
support or oppose, editors would be asked to assess the candidate's
contributions in several different aspects
But the important thing is that not all admins do everything. A user who
has never reverted a single vandal can become an admin as much as a user who
has never tagged an article for speedy deletion, or written a featured
article. This system would prevent that.
--Mets501