On 3/28/07, Oldak Quill <oldakquill(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
This discussion isn't about allowing certain banned users to continue
editing, it is about not reverting particular kinds of edits
regardless of whether the user is banned or not (the argument being
that to revert the edits doesn't benefit Wikipedia and expends energy
unnecessarily).
--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)
Actually thats exactly it. People edit warred with me to ensure brandt's
words stayed up. I don't understand why he gets a free pass, as Erica said.
Either all banned users should, or none. If they want to contribute... use a
different name. If we KNOW it's them, rv them as policy says. If that isn't
right, change the policy.
- Denny
Arbcom have in the past ruled that acting as a proxy for a blocked
user is a serious offence.
--
geni